A prior post looked at the state’s thinking and planning concerning the gaming industry. Or maybe it’s the gaming industry’s plan, I don’t know. Maybe they put their heads together to decide the rules. Oh yeh, I think that’s called lobbying. Continue reading
I live in small town America. I heard a story last night about something in our small town America…and if the same story is happening all over in other small town Americas, the country is in big trouble.
The story goes like this…a second grade teacher just finished testing on her second grade students. The test results go like this…70% of this class are reading in the kindergarten to 1st grade range. But the children are in second grade.
Maybe someday I will get to write the entire story. I hope so.
Who are Friends of White County Schools? Who is Ameresco?
And so the quest began.
This post is about local politics….I think. Actually it extends farther than that. It is statewide because as long as each county in our state continues to ask the taxpayers for a new 1% sales tax, it is a statewide matter. But let me start at the beginning.
In 2014, our county was asked to consider a 1% sales tax increase under the school facility tax law. The tax would be used to take care of public school facilities. The same year, 13 other counties were also putting the same referendum on their ballots. Like most school districts, the locals care about their schools. You don’t have to twist their arms to come to the rescue of the education system. The citizens where I live are constantly doing things to make their district better. People are always donating and raising funds to do things for the district. So it’s not necessary to LIE to them, to deceive, or to hoodwink. It really isn’t.
Ads were purchased in the local newspaper by such entities as Ameresco, Friends of White County Schools. These all came through one school board member. He ordered the ads with my newspaper and told me to bill him. I handled the insertion of them into the newspaper. We received payment sometime after the referendum passed, I believe.
The beginning of my quest was to ask who are “Friends of White County Schools”? I asked a school teacher and she had never heard of them. I asked a couple of other people, but no one knew. My interest was now being piqued. Who were these shadowy entities? By this time, I had read an op ed written by a newspaper on the other end of the county which explained who Ameresco was. I could find Ameresco on the internet. Another name that had come up was StifelNicolaus. Prominently. Like the head of the spear. They are on the internet too, a multi billion-dollar international investment banking conglomerate headquartered in Missouri. My sources say that Stifel initiates state sales tax hike campaigns by having its representatives travel the state, meeting with county and school board members, administrators, regional superintendents and other corporate and community groups, all in efforts to convince local officials to launch pro-tax hike campaigns. This same source goes on to say “At an Illinois Association of School Business Officials meeting in 2011, before school administrators from across the state, Stifel distributed materials touting how they helped execute a massive campaign to convince Champaign County school boards and voters to initiate and pass a tax hike in 2009 benefiting Stifel’s bottom line. The net result of the campaign was more than $60 million in new taxes on Champaign County shoppers since the tax was enacted.”
And there’s more. Just keep reading.
Had Stifel-Nicolaus been instrumental in pushing this referendum in my county? According to Pat Seil’s Op Ed in July of 2015 in The Navigator, representatives of Ameresco, a St. Louis based performance contractor, had approached the Grayville School board about doing a lot of improvements on their buildings as well as erect a new building. Stifel-Nicolaus, working hand in glove, was also in attendance, offering to finance the whole job, which amount approached what the district would be able to borrow because of the new tax.
I happened upon a website one day. I say “happened,” however, I don’t believe in coincidence. Coincidence is just God revealing things and making things come to light. I found the Illinois Sunshine website. As I perused their listings, I kept seeing Friends of Marion Schools, Friends of Peoria Schools, etc. Oh my, was I in the right place or what?! Illinois Sunshine www.illinoissunshine.org is a site devoted to tracking campaigns and where the money is coming from and going. It is an excellent resource.
Illinois Sunshine had no information about Friends of White County Schools, but I knew I was in the right place, so I emailed them, asking them about the group. I received no correspondence from them, but a couple of weeks later I decided to take another look and do a search. Sure enough, Friend of White County Schools was NOW listed! I now had all the information I needed, including who were the shadowy figures behind it and who funded the referendum.
Friends of White County Schools was founded on October 9, 2014, shortly before the 2014 mid term elections. Carmi-White County School Board member Andy Acord is listed as the Treasurer of the Committee and H. Keith Botsch is listed as the President. (Mr. Botsch has some troubles of his own, being linked with some misbehavior with a bank.) The group was founded as a Ballot Initiative Committee. Five days later, after its founding on October 14, 2014, Thermal Mechanics, Inc. from Missouri, gave $10,000 to the Committee. Who is Thermal Mechanics?
Thermal Mechanics, Inc. has corporate headquarters in Chesterfield, Mo. Google says they are “System Design & Engineering Resources, New & Replacement HVAC Equipment, Integrated Building Controls, Mechanical & Building Controls, Service Planned, Maintenance Contracts, Building Controls System Monitoring, Certified OEM Replacement Parts, 24/7 Emergency Service ..”. Who knows how Thermal Mechanics Inc, found out a county in Southern Illinois needed money to pass a referendum and educate the voters? They are the only contributors to the “committee.” I’m sure it’s all legal.
So, a lot of important, big corporations have a lot of interest in passing these 1% sales tax increases. But here’s the interesting part. Did anyone read the law before putting these referendums on the ballot?
I accidentally read the law.
And the law says this: “…this tax shall be imposed only in 1/4% increments, up to 1%.” It doesn’t say START at 1%. It says, in my opinion, essentially, start at 1/4%, then you can move it up, but stop at 1%. Huh? So why is everyone putting 1% on the ballot? Good question. I did read that one county put 1/2% on their ballot.
I’m starting to get mad now. And I suspect Stifel-Nicolaus has a WHOLE LOT TO DO with how the referendum (scheme) is being presented to school boards and consequently, to the public, who is being lied to. I don’t suppose school boards read the actual law.
So I maintain that the referendums themselves are, essentially, breaking the law as it is written and therefore illegal.
Let’s see where this all goes. Oh, one more thing…the State of Illinois has a vested interest in keeping things the way they are…they get to keep 2% of all the new tax money coming in. Just think what a cut they would take if all the referendums went down to 1/4%….I’m just sayin’.
Update: Ok, since I posted this article, I have discovered another way to read the Illinois statute about the tax being imposed only in 1/4% increments…it can be read “as opposed to 1/3% increments.” However, it does seem to me that this should have been made more clear. I still maintain that the use of two absolutes (in a society that claims no absolutes) in this statute has meaning. It’s like using the words “no, not ever.” That seems pretty clear, doesn’t it? Of course, for those of us who believe in absolutes, words absolutely have meaning. We can probably thank progressive lawyers for all the confusion we have now about words and their meaning.
Update #2: So another thought occurred to me. There is a pdf file of information put out by the State of Illinois on the School Facility Tax law. See link County School Facility Occupation Tax, scroll down to the question, What Tax Rate Can be Imposed. The wording has been changed a bit from what the actual statute states, which I find interesting. This document says the tax “may be imposed” in 1/4% increments. This is much more permissive wording from “shall be” and “only” imposed in 1/4% increments, which is how it is written in the original state statute. I wonder why it was changed…
I work for a newspaper. A small town newspaper, but a newspaper nonetheless. This week we got a letter from a “Freedom of Information Officer” from one of the small towns in the area. It seems we are “making too many mistakes in reporting the minutes of their meetings.” But no one has ever, not once, called in to tell us that; not one complaint has ever come. We would gladly print a retraction if we are wrong about something. This baffles me. They want the right to preview our reports from now on before we print.
This is a government board. How much would they want retracted from the original report? And who the heck is a “Freedom of Information Officer?” The Freedom of Information Act is there to guarantee that citizens are allowed to see and hear what their government is doing. In another town, they threatened to do all their meetings in executive session, just because we brought a recorder. The recorder is to guarantee we get it right, not to do a “gotcha.”
Imagine if the Federal Government or the State government asked for the right to preview everything that gets printed about them. It would be gridlock!
Like most of what we see in politics these days, someone throws out a vague accusation against another, but never gives the details, and when asked to give one, they usually can’t think of anything. I suspect that may be what this is. Being a newspaper employee, I intend to have them put all those details, list every single error they think we have made, in writing, because if we did make a mistake, we need to correct it, right? This also validates our decision to record the meetings. It’s benefits both of us, media and government. It protects both of us.
So…I haven’t posted here in a while. It’s hard to keep up with more than one blog and I’m not doing that well over on the other one! I’ve published a children’s book this spring and I now work part time for a weekly newspaper.
I thought the information about Marco Rubio was important. There’s also some question about his natural born status. I don’t think he meets the definition because his parents came from Cuba and weren’t citizens when he was born. At least that’s what my investigation has revealed. His attitude toward the immigration debate shows his allegiance is not to our laws, in my opinion.
Anyway, I want to talk about my recent run for election. I’ve noticed that in our country these days, sometimes the law isn’t taken very seriously. This definitely comes from the top post in Washington, D.C. and I believe it filters down into every area. What the top man allows seems to tell others they can do it too.
In my township, we have a man in elected office who doesn’t live in the township. Now, he claims he does, but in actuality, he does not. He has been our township supervisor now for 4 years. He beat out a friend of mine who actually does live in the township and who had served honorably for 16 years. This year he decided to run for trustee. I decided it was time to do something to stop him. Since I missed a deadline to challenge his nomination, I had to move on to other methods. I have decided that this deadline is actually for the members of his particular party since I, as a member of the opposing party, would have no actual knowledge of his candidacy other than what I might hear through the grapevine. I did not attend their caucus.
Since I missed the deadline that I had no knowledge of, I decided to run against him in particular, as an absentee candidate. This was a way to dislodge him from the office he was seeking. In the event that he would win, the state election board told me that I could ask for a hearing into his residency. I lost the election, and the lawyers for the township refused my request for a hearing, saying my request was “untimely” since I should have opposed his nomination in the time period allowed, even though I couldn’t be sure he was nominated. It’s all very vague, in a way. So the lawyers denied me a hearing, giving me some legal mumbo jumbo and reminding me of some other requirements for that office that he doesn’t meet.
Let’s just say I must now take the last and perhaps final step. And it’s a very serious step. Why should I do it? Because it’s the right thing to do. Because the only way for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing. Because “we have a set of freaking laws in this country” as Pat (from the Glenn Beck show) says. I have counsel from the state election board that this is the next step. I have waited for a time, not wanting to cost the taxpayers of my township any financial hardship and needing to make sure they would not be strapped with legal bills. We have poked and prodded the frog, but he does not want to budge. I wonder if the $50 a month he receives will be worth the hassle in the end. Stay tuned.